Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44317 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91682 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2009 18:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2009 18:53:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.117 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.117 us-mr1.zend.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [63.205.162.117] ([63.205.162.117:33328] helo=us-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8F/03-31180-24AE73A4 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:53:55 -0400 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (us-ex1.zend.net [192.168.16.5]) by us-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C3FE12BB; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.16.83] ([192.168.16.83]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:54:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4A37EA3F.3010704@zend.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:53:51 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: Derick Rethans , 'PHP Internals' References: <4A31462B.1070302@zend.com> <4A37CEC2.7050001@zend.com> <0FD8F38A-205D-4B79-AE8A-E7AFE475BC17@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <0FD8F38A-205D-4B79-AE8A-E7AFE475BC17@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2009 18:54:17.0993 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9F35790:01C9EEB3] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: bug #48247 again From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > so if this issue is also in 5.2 .. i feel even less inclined to delay a > stable 5.3 release because of this issue. have we made it worse in our > attempts to fix it? the fact that this bug isnt fixed yet could mean No, it was crash before, now it doesn't crash for me but produces 400K of errors. One can argue it's better now, though pretty marginally as in both cases system can not be considered stable. Of course, there's an easy workaround of setting the timezone. > 1) the issue affects few users > 2) the issue is so complex that we continuously try to fix it and fail We didn't "continuously" try to fix it - we applied one fix for the crash (which was caused by different reason than the loop), and need another for the loop. As for why people don't complain more - I guess it's because it has obvious workaround and once people don't have it anymore many are too lazy to complain about the problem which now is not their problem :) > both issues do not sound like good reason to delay 5.3 from where i stand. We don't need to delay it if we decide to commit my (incomplete) fix now. Anyway, it's your decision, one of the three: 1. leave it as is, 2. commit incomplete fix now, 3. wait for complete fix. I agree 3 is the worst, I'd go with 2 but if you decide to go with 1 that's OK. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com