Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44248 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72726 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2009 18:25:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jun 2009 18:25:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.121 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.121 c2bthomr03.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.121] ([213.123.20.121:16798] helo=c2bthomr03.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/CE-01167-B1C413A4 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:25:32 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.150] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr03.btconnect.com with ESMTP id BVX56021; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:25:28 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A314C17.1050202@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:25:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090408 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4A30BF03.8010809@lsces.co.uk> <20090611171859.7994.627AFB7B@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090611171859.7994.627AFB7B@blueyonder.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr03.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0208.4A314C19.00EA,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=10.0.0.150, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.7.1/2009-05-14 X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Standards for developers From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Niel Archer wrote: >> >> One of the problems with playing with a new platform is getting things >> they way you are used to them. Linux is somewhat easier than Windows in >> that respect, but using Eclipse has at least provided a level playing >> field and now that I've got it tidied up and working on the Vista64 box >> ( has to use w32 jave to run ;) ) I can now get around some of the >> little niggles. > > I do not understand why you have to run with win32 Java. There is a 64 > bit version of Java from Sun which runs on Windows. Like most 64 bit > support on Windows, it takes some work to locate, the Java site mentions > it, but despite referring to a download I can't find it there. Instead, > I use this link: > > http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index.jsp > > Also, there is a 64 bit version of Eclipse, although you have to do some > digging to find it exists. Go to the mirror of your choice and look for > the 'eclipse-platform-SDK-3.4-win32-x86_64.zip' file. This requires > that you add any dependencies for PDT etc yourself, but as each project > lists its dependencies this is not a real problem. However, it's the > only 64 bit version of Eclipse I have been able to find, PDT does not do > a bundle for x64 yet :-( PHPEclipse is still x86 as well ... I have no plans to move to PDT any time soon as I know most of the PHPEclipse code quite well now! Along with a couple of other SQL packages. I tried the x86_64 build but could not install the other bits that I use successfully on the 64 bit version on Linux ... not enough hours to waste even more time fixing side issues, so I switched to what I was told DID work, and it's doing what I need. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php