Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44215 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35933 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2009 15:33:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2009 15:33:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 209.85.222.191 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.191 mail-pz0-f191.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.191] ([209.85.222.191:62666] helo=mail-pz0-f191.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 42/52-50806-C42DF2A4 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:33:34 -0400 Received: by pzk29 with SMTP id 29so45103pzk.29 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.240.11 with SMTP id n11mr2223283wah.191.1244648009667; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monster.local ([76.84.30.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j34sm9219218waf.64.2009.06.10.08.33.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A2FD247.9010504@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:33:27 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guilherme Blanco CC: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= , PHP Internals References: <1244645012.6252.110.camel@goldfinger> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Last steps towards 5.3.0 From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Greg Beaver) Guilherme Blanco wrote: > Just 2 questions.... > > 1- Will it include new autoloader definition that standards group was > talking about? Hi, I am not an official RM representative, the following is my opinion: Not the slightest chance. It hasn't even been suggested to internals yet and additionally qualifies as a new feature, so it was a pipe dream of the group in question that it would get into 5.3. Greg