Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:44191 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49950 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2009 21:05:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2009 21:05:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.116 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.116 us-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.116] ([63.205.162.116:31083] helo=us-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F3/13-33614-5A8892A4 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:05:41 -0400 Received: from [192.168.16.137] ([192.168.16.137]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:05:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4A2988A2.9050601@zend.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:05:38 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Moon CC: Philip Olson , Rasmus Lerdorf , Hannes Magnusson , Roman I , internals internals , Stanislav Malyshev References: <94.6F.05315.44EF11A4@pb1.pair.com> <77E6891A-AF77-47B5-94DB-FA69D4F7F198@roshambo.org> <4A28B16A.2040101@lerdorf.com> <7f3ed2c30906050043g3f014e63j6f74abb1f04373b0@mail.gmail.com> <4A28CEE4.10403@lerdorf.com> <4A296F51.8050102@zend.com> <4A297214.6050505@php.net> In-Reply-To: <4A297214.6050505@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2009 21:05:58.0040 (UTC) FILETIME=[6C339980:01C9E621] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is there a technical reason No, #1 in your list is why people got sick of it. You want to bind the > decoupling of two different issues. I do not insist on 1. I'd be ok with not touching short tags but just moving The only change I care to see is that