Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43957 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87089 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 20:07:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 2009 20:07:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andrei@gravitonic.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andrei@gravitonic.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain gravitonic.com from 209.85.200.174 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andrei@gravitonic.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.200.174 wf-out-1314.google.com Received: from [209.85.200.174] ([209.85.200.174:18435] helo=wf-out-1314.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/45-27038-21A7C0A4 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:07:47 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so822096wfc.26 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.51.4 with SMTP id y4mr816146wfy.131.1242331664416; Thu, 14 May 2009 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from barley.local (64-71-7-198.static.wiline.com [64.71.7.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm866688wfd.39.2009.05.14.13.07.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 13:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A0C7A0E.9070005@gravitonic.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:07:42 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky CC: jani.taskinen@iki.fi, PHP Development References: <7033A53F-D4BF-437F-A6AA-AD42C3288342@prohost.org> <4A0C575E.3020305@gravitonic.com> <4A0C649E.4040609@gravitonic.com> <4A0C672E.2010200@sci.fi> <4A0C68F9.2050506@gravitonic.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.10 From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Andrei, > > There is no question about functionality being useful for some people. > But what is the point of different branches if we put whatever we want > into each branch? We may as well stick to one branch and commit > features, bug fixes, etc... into it. I would fully agree with you if this concerned a user-visible API change or a new feature. But this is simply exposing a couple of internal functions so that they are visible from other extensions, and, arguably, something that should have been done properly from the beginning. -Andrei