Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43944 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45907 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:36:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:36:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andrei@gravitonic.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andrei@gravitonic.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain gravitonic.com from 209.85.222.117 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andrei@gravitonic.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.222.117 mail-pz0-f117.google.com Received: from [209.85.222.117] ([209.85.222.117:41187] helo=mail-pz0-f117.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C1/1C-27038-BA46C0A4 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:36:28 -0400 Received: by pzk15 with SMTP id 15so688887pzk.29 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.70.11 with SMTP id s11mr814977wfa.42.1242326184854; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ale.local (64-71-7-198.static.wiline.com [64.71.7.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 29sm677541wfg.8.2009.05.14.11.36.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 May 2009 11:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A0C649E.4040609@gravitonic.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:36:14 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky CC: PHP Development References: <7033A53F-D4BF-437F-A6AA-AD42C3288342@prohost.org> <4A0C575E.3020305@gravitonic.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.10 From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski) It doesn't impact anything though, does it? And it would really help for implementing json-based serializers (such as for memcached). -Andrei Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > This is a new feature, so it would be more appropriate for 5.3/6 more so > then for 5.2 IMHO. > > Ilia Alshanetsky > > > > > On 14-May-09, at 1:39 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > >> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >>> We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while >>> 5.3 is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in >>> terms of final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to >>> do one more 5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be >>> discontinued. I would like to roll an RC1 by May 28th, so please get >>> your fixes in. >> >> I would really like to make a patch to ext/json to expose the >> encoding/decoding functions so that they can be called from other >> extensions. I should be able to wrap this up in the next few days. >> >> -Andrei > >