Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43930 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9989 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 16:45:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 2009 16:45:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.120 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.120 c2bthomr02.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.120] ([213.123.20.120:2817] helo=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 75/64-27038-DAA4C0A4 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 12:45:34 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.150] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr02.btconnect.com with ESMTP id KIV51715; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:45:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4A0C4AA5.5070808@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:45:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090408 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <7033A53F-D4BF-437F-A6AA-AD42C3288342@prohost.org> In-Reply-To: <7033A53F-D4BF-437F-A6AA-AD42C3288342@prohost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B020A.4A0C4AAB.0142,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=10.0.0.150, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.7.1/2008-09-02 X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.10 From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > We have a fair number of fixes in the 5.2 branch already and while 5.3 > is making very good progress I think it is still ways off in terms of > final release and stabilization. I think it makes sense to do one more > 5.2 release before 5.3 is out and 5.2 can be discontinued. I would like > to roll an RC1 by May 28th, so please get your fixes in. Since 5.3 DOES require some work to port legacy applications over PLEASE do not discontinue 5.2 security fixes until 5.3 has bedded down ( remember 5.1 ... ) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php