Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43843 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53854 invoked from network); 4 May 2009 22:18:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 May 2009 22:18:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=shire@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=shire@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 208.43.138.18 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: shire@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 208.43.138.18 sizzo.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [208.43.138.18] ([208.43.138.18:37270] helo=sizzo.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 13/D1-57065-BA96FF94 for ; Mon, 04 May 2009 18:18:19 -0400 Received: from shirebook.local (outbound500a.pasd.tfbnw.net [204.15.21.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sizzo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56979CBE655; Mon, 4 May 2009 15:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49FF69A5.3040408@php.net> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 15:18:13 -0700 Reply-To: shire@php.net User-Agent: Postbox 1.0b11 (Macintosh/2009041623) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Wilmas CC: internals@lists.php.net, Nuno Lopes , Lukas Kahwe Smith , Dmitry Stogov References: <6604D94D40FD465F992144110B075BB5@pc1> <9D5D4CBF-5CB1-47EC-81F4-59E3C48EEEEF@pooteeweet.org> <49FE9AE7.4000008@php.net> <6886527DD6D44DFAAC29221BAE374B07@pc1> <49FF410B.2030807@php.net> <3BCF6C07D9B2434D91A32A8E28C69A41@pc1> In-Reply-To: <3BCF6C07D9B2434D91A32A8E28C69A41@pc1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Scanner "diet" with fixes, etc. From: shire@php.net (shire) Matt Wilmas wrote: > > Gotcha. If something changes, YYFILL -- or something to handle what > needs to be done -- could just be added to the manual parts as > necessary, right? > Sorry forget to reply on this one, but yeah we'd have to do a manual call to YYFILL or a check or whatever we come up with wherever we're scanning ahead manually. (there's probably some other parts that might need this as well). -shire