Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43701
Return-Path: <arvids.godjuks@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 49692 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2009 15:11:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Apr 2009 15:11:14 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=arvids.godjuks@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=arvids.godjuks@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.220.153 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.14.220.153 fg-out-1718.google.com  
Received: from [72.14.220.153] ([72.14.220.153:22568] helo=fg-out-1718.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 15/60-47392-197A4E94 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:11:14 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so744474fgb.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=UKVWJjoSACKZ4oUECp3tnU2sIF0D8nsut98rnwxJccU=;
        b=qvB7RmgAAQY5kgy+3SJJeYVcRcniYWgMlPQD+ZHW9lxXOPCuCn2QsVt8dNOjXAkEok
         1AVA72+59wnUhnDu1jE3JwrbyKcDjmKaQt5DMfNN0a56aZggyDZpnOLY6/U7QR6OHC7q
         VENsrJMB/N+DwkkrZvRtXYtarzM4d6bWfESlk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=ef5dxMTL0fUGyYwR/VIJEE1NzFkAx5I4xYu1aIzKgVdgxgjqhHS0QsNGjZhTYlh9TQ
         KR52sWpSTGfmRRnEFUHy070B03Elhs0NAPRbGQNwOW8ZkFbggBfLKg6a714ovyltSzHp
         fEz5I8zEe67U5hHPRg2sunCaFrAJQ3MuwSAP0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.86.91.3 with SMTP id o3mr5724888fgb.3.1239721870697; Tue, 14 
	Apr 2009 08:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <49E47BF2.3090807@gmail.com>
References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <DB.C3.22673.B3373E94@pb1.pair.com>
	 <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com>
	 <ECCFDCE9-C262-49AC-A0E7-B24A2199A117@roshambo.org>
	 <49E47BF2.3090807@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:11:10 +0300
Message-ID: <9b3df6a50904140811o6d57a426gd320a822271e19f3@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd29778b9240d0467853d3f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 
	6?
From: arvids.godjuks@gmail.com (Arvids Godjuks)

--000e0cd29778b9240d0467853d3f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello everyone.
I've been writing <?php echo get('something')?> for some time now at the
last project and it really sucks. I understand reason on depricating
short_open_tag and I agree. But I have a proposal witch can ease templating.

Remove short open tag, but leave <?=get('blah')?>. Bacicaly PHP parser
should look for <?php or <?=, single <? is not allowed. That way:
1). short_open_tag is gone for good as an option in .ini.
2). Making templates doesn't suck
3). Backwards compability with old templates is preserved (old templates
with <?= work fine).
4). <? in code is broken as you want it to be and makes coders fix it with
<?php

Everyone is happy, XML and others are safe.

Yes, it's really irritating to write <?php echo every time!

--000e0cd29778b9240d0467853d3f--