Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43698 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 8207 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2009 12:26:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Apr 2009 12:26:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=glen.84@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=glen.84@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: glen.84@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.179 mail-ew0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.219.179] ([209.85.219.179:55590] helo=mail-ew0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F0/43-01762-4F084E94 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:26:29 -0400 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2807412ewy.23 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U2mIDnBqY5h4fkHuWxStppK3+0DDKiCQPUQrNZPmIO8=; b=Q3cOGZvzisDPac2YzVLP11BeAsYwmBUlq+vjufxnw/4lj+EmPLlAxYt9QXw7nN+vpx 1n4qaloVeTCtJjmSlic7uNHHuK9LbocDTPc8RNlUxfkH7NiaUJIpQs+aCTG6gNsrzwve vzQHFK6z9cve41UNx9Hj3mSsXIKmBKtwPH3Xw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qTTrqVvG5YlPYuC0/TcXIZtXRi2K3fpJvaQL37vayb3Zoq3TzZ3Xq1MrOWK4ljD3AL 5a+vggN01OcQVq54qR8se1uNLGJ9klZkHT5h0Bf/7EiV78XgxePTlODV/RGE3uzI5zOx 8amYcNXXVVub11ZijTOPn5TrL5MGBm2pIZH5k= Received: by 10.216.7.209 with SMTP id 59mr1752933wep.213.1239711985927; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? (dsl-240-11-65.telkomadsl.co.za [41.240.11.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm262307gve.2.2009.04.14.05.26.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49E480E7.1050603@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:26:15 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Vassilev | FM CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com> <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> <942B925388194249865069F9BE75F87E@pc> In-Reply-To: <942B925388194249865069F9BE75F87E@pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6? From: glen.84@gmail.com (Glen) I didn't say PHP tags were valid XML. I said short_open_tag conflicts with Hi, > > A vote in support of short tags, although last time I checked they > were not removed in PHP6 (and I hate to see this brought up once more). > On top of that, the supposed XML conflict argument is not fully > thought through, since full PHP tags are not XML compliant either: > > "; ?> > > In the above example, XML parsers would do this: > > Processing directive: > Text node: "; ? > Parse error: > > > As you see, it's a much simpler world when we realize PHP was never > supposed to be XML in the first place. However it was supposed to be a > preprocessing templating engine, and so we need to keep it optimized > for that. > > Regards, > Stan Vassilev >