Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43692 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96615 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2009 11:41:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Apr 2009 11:41:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=glen.84@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=glen.84@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: glen.84@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.179 mail-ew0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.219.179] ([209.85.219.179:61788] helo=mail-ew0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/A0-01762-37674E94 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:41:40 -0400 Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2784008ewy.23 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:41:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F1YBZOxYEUFLMUzEk/4Edg/Kstj4uc9ggVwfsL+o3Qo=; b=HBUGL1FUIx5MPsyvCa9rPWgXXAUeXWQYRTmQrHAWmDQQ0SkURTNUmb1CLetBQJ1KJb CU+pNct7/n+BHjZWN9JjWcbQ1L7RvOh/QqsFpg7B0FRmC3F2+m+5Nq8bWApFQEPSeN56 UDbqj5VRHhSipQIEDmVbxOuL+pWwgNdPBcCm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DKJ9k8Ao3f3xLKUJGPxdKPAPtPeUI/Tm2fFUxDFN+cqCFTJsnDYpeVlluXxv0Xhwmf jebjRusdt8Nx93zSyvPCg4iDV6KVlXLhqD2gIBTkEBn+hKJFd1NHUD3h0W8Eh/GRbm/k xgYO2ODJ5J1K+K1Ekao7SlJ01oLIl7BBz6KQw= Received: by 10.216.20.83 with SMTP id o61mr1742536weo.206.1239709296815; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.100? (dsl-240-11-65.telkomadsl.co.za [41.240.11.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm15784225gvf.12.2009.04.14.04.41.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49E47664.9090005@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:41:24 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Panchenko CC: Stanislav Malyshev , Kalle Sommer Nielsen , Jeremy , internals@lists.php.net References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com> <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> <5faa7b820904131319k718c53fav761d0b5ce6722537@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5faa7b820904131319k718c53fav761d0b5ce6722537@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6? From: glen.84@gmail.com (Glen) I'm not suggesting anyone be forced to do anything. But: ... <%= $this->that; %> Looks neater than: '; ?> ... that; ?> Hence my suggestion. Glen. Mike Panchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > >> It's a pretty small use case (that's a problem only if you have xml >> documents which has to have php code which has to be inlined) and as you >> see, can be easily handled. I think that should not make whole very useful >> syntax deprecated. >> >> > > +1 > > One of the reason's for PHP's success IMO is the ease of creating templates > with it. Forcing everyone to write every time just just > so that you don't have to write off. My $.02. > > Mike. > >