Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43683 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62627 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2009 20:19:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Apr 2009 20:19:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=drwoland@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=drwoland@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.182 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: drwoland@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.182 wa-out-1112.google.com Received: from [209.85.146.182] ([209.85.146.182:39691] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C5/8B-22673-65E93E94 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:19:35 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so1154664wah.7 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:19:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=SkjpOsg/jsQPdnfXrlgE0l5veTpTN2hFLbLpLkF45II=; b=OW3BHOxSURkvUYuupBAjQHb2xwnAb0Q0OFrG1Lg48yKs/SPY9SCV8WBy76F2MU9qpQ tNyLaGS2lkVw7pWq8cO2LNEPa6KCjFtCOUUyhZvl7bZbfUIHq0PzokLoDf5n+51/cvU6 6id85fUoHp2kohl7dtdJsL1wPQOCq/vcst20E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=HsPVyojT1j6z9PPkywWmEGzmCYqwWhYqC+ooeOCiiONtqTjlSbA8u0cRnTi+QGgcLd CnHq0Nh2B0dHxpUHktMws9UvUoG2UHFGse4kweHPY2h+6vHhXFOVNEzidAfVkRjYis3X PlMRFKrlidWym00ZbenRay0AQ6kLoWfTrTkxQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: drwoland@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.133.1 with SMTP id g1mr3342269wad.21.1239653972177; Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:19:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com> <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:19:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 51c1decc36deeaf1 Message-ID: <5faa7b820904131319k718c53fav761d0b5ce6722537@mail.gmail.com> To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: Kalle Sommer Nielsen , Jeremy , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64dd4cea7f44d0467756ef1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6? From: m@mihasya.com (Mike Panchenko) --0016e64dd4cea7f44d0467756ef1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > It's a pretty small use case (that's a problem only if you have xml > documents which has to have php code which has to be inlined) and as you > see, can be easily handled. I think that should not make whole very useful > syntax deprecated. > +1 One of the reason's for PHP's success IMO is the ease of creating templates with it. Forcing everyone to write every time just just so that you don't have to write