Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43506
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 209.85.198.235 cause and error)
Message-ID: <49CC3AEE.6040704@chiaraquartet.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:33:18 -0500
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net>
CC: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, 
 "Ionut G. Stan" <ionut.g.stan@gmail.com>,
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <49CBCACF.1060407@gmail.com>	 <fe05d1540903261237j5be65f2cy2470d894652d1cda@mail.gmail.com>	 <49CC1DCD.6080508@chiaraquartet.net> <2dedb8a0903261854l45921cau389dc8c74638b217@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2dedb8a0903261854l45921cau389dc8c74638b217@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Minor problems with PHP 5.3.0 RC1 on Windows
From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Greg Beaver)

Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi Greg
>
> 2009/3/27 Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net>:
>   
>> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>>     
>>>> - php_phar.dll present as an option in php.ini but there is no need (causes
>>>> confusion)
>>>>         
>>> Will be change when we are sure of the built type (builtin or shared)
>>>       
>> What is the debate?  Whether windows build should match unix build?
>>     
>
> The question is that, should Phar be built staticlly or shared by
> default in the Windows distro, as it is right now then Phar is built
> staticlly and if its kept that way then extension=php_phar.dll will be
> useless in php.ini.
>   

Hi,

My next question is why there is still debate on this question when the
question was settled by the RMs on internals on Nov. 18, 2008

http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=122684228317217&w=2

This is why I am asking - am I confused about the finality of this decision?

Greg