Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43246 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95099 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2009 13:14:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2009 13:14:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mikko.koppanen@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mikko.koppanen@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.46.30 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mikko.koppanen@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.46.30 yw-out-2324.google.com Received: from [74.125.46.30] ([74.125.46.30:26834] helo=yw-out-2324.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7E/61-22733-5CE7EA94 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:14:46 -0500 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1945338ywe.83 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:14:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=Y6YAyjHGTK/wx6liv+efPRBkr6WZirqG3RKOxJYAvwg=; b=Fn7VDykoCNStbSgZygvba/+fCdFPmtCvyBT4pPTUKdrIl/49GIK8/TuXHXPkdiYdi3 KUnFFDq/DdsgeUlAtbd0U1G8p22/GSeARxCeB6DcQpjLNcx5aSziNM/xXj3PBjkWhW8/ s3TaXlx9i5pFiuGvgY82oDFjp83TDk+dTP1xs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=AMYi0TTLNqOkTW41ebNYwgQC5+bYCquYs8TgnGuDL39m+YCHUJ4Oe6kR7/Fp+OsGy/ QqvB1j6q5mgH0vGRzjOVUbarllOwJn2Ti/zcQWl0bayAjZyswP3RYfXhkobz9h1GqLdC H1Sc+J2VydB3nj/raBbSa8tKaSEyj8tOfyH2g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mikko.koppanen@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.45.142 with SMTP id e14mr2718894vcf.95.1236172483192; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:14:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:14:43 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 28606d0c2f324b21 Message-ID: <8cf711460903040514l26ef53c5l7929ca74376ae4ca@mail.gmail.com> To: Kenan Sulayman Cc: mike , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64717eabde76804644ad5ef Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] How expensive are function_exists() calls? From: mkoppanen@php.net (Mikko Koppanen) --0016e64717eabde76804644ad5ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Kenan Sulayman wrote: > Hello Mike! > > Depending on how you'd define expensive, it may variate. > Normally, on websites function_exists(x) ain't expensive. > > Altrought function_exists needed 0.000077009201049805 seconds to execute. > Do you think, that's pretty expensive ? > > Please move this thread to the php-general mailing-list. -- Mikko Koppanen --0016e64717eabde76804644ad5ef--