Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43106
Return-Path: <shadda@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 67699 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2009 06:36:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Feb 2009 06:36:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=shadda@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=shadda@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.236 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: shadda@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.236 rv-out-0506.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.198.236] ([209.85.198.236:19883] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 98/3D-19120-00EFC994 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:36:49 -0500
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so257720rvf.23
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:36:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        bh=+hzvXOR7h4IBTfftTxVCvPuJOsJYPdbykFtIOAyB470=;
        b=DmzWmBe/5uOgnnrZxy0ROt1iz2NXyBILv4IjaqYQvJCmdJN7NnSwfCD+HcGfWxDRRe
         eL0TSnPnq0EYPy2DZLDQJEAfyg+/1pOf5hihLKapaBpBSfdqNGg3qn3mukXxFXjS+3rU
         U2O2F/YcPyQKGpNxDMTeo/ftm7pjCnRlQTWu4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=cbMqhEutpwqWWYelp72DIIKMhVfT/Hucf2GXL1raUhkOhRbRasq99Pl2txhBnALDD/
         miVbFHbREFurTIXQqK7RyWF67/i9iz35eFK6PFaVXgK4DLcMw+UKis2FRnK6Aa+lp0OQ
         H5IL67Kke1NHS1LaZkGJkTasQALaHPtBZaT90=
Received: by 10.140.200.14 with SMTP id x14mr581836rvf.55.1235025406083;
        Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.117? ([75.87.134.66])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm1852053rvb.7.2009.02.18.22.36.44
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <FB609374-3341-40CF-BCD4-6241D6B37E66@gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <ce6b011c0902182134k65c27c69n51d3a8c6265f2db6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:36:42 -0600
References: <ce6b011c0902182134k65c27c69n51d3a8c6265f2db6@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Vote: allow_call_time_pass_reference value in production INI
From: shadda@gmail.com (Matt Wilson)

+1 Off (Issue warnings)

On Feb 18, 2009, at 11:34 PM, Eric Stewart wrote:

> We seem to have a split opinion on what the production INI value for
> allow_call_time_pass_reference should be.
>
> As I understand it, this does not enable or disable the ability to  
> pass
> references at call time. It only enables or disables PHP's warnings  
> about
> this behavior.
>
> I currently have it set to On because I feel a production server  
> should not
> be issuing deprecation type warnings, that is definitely a function  
> for
> development servers. But PHP and these INIs belong to us all and I  
> feel the
> opinion of the community majority should make this decision. So lets  
> have a
> vote.
>
> allow_call_time_pass_reference = On (Suppress Warnings)
>
> or
>
> allow_call_time_pass_reference = Off (Issue Warnings)
>
> Eric Lee Stewart