Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43080 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36078 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2009 21:03:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2009 21:03:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stefan.esser@sektioneins.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stefan.esser@sektioneins.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain sektioneins.de from 85.214.103.31 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stefan.esser@sektioneins.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.103.31 h1332034.stratoserver.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.103.31] ([85.214.103.31:19813] helo=h1332034.stratoserver.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B4/59-36931-8262B994 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:03:38 -0500 Received: from Very-Black-Mac.local (xdsl-78-34-17-73.netcologne.de [78.34.17.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by h1332034.stratoserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C21A245D2; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:54:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <499B26AC.8050905@sektioneins.de> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:05:48 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= CC: Dmitry Stogov , PHP Internals References: <1234904343.17605.35.camel@goldfinger> In-Reply-To: <1234904343.17605.35.camel@goldfinger> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZEND_USER_OPCODE_CONTINUE From: stefan.esser@sektioneins.de (Stefan Esser) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Johannes, > while implementing a small toy extension (see [1]) I found out that > ZEND_USER_OPCODE_CONTINUE seems to misbehave as it doesn't go to the > next opcode so I ended up in an endless loop executing the same opcode > again and again. I guess that is exactly the required behaviour. How else do you want to implement an user opcode that transfers control to another opline, like a special kind of jump opcode. Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmbJqwACgkQSuF5XhWr2njnzACgizi7a24c6GxNKTwMPU3SjvFF KLQAnRz4w6i36ogEmT0LBofAjI5EiULP =KDZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----