Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:4301 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30236 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Aug 2003 02:32:02 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30187 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2003 02:32:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccmmhc02.asp.att.net) (204.127.203.184) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2003 02:32:01 -0000 Received: from insightbb.com (12-223-87-232.client.insightbb.com[12.223.87.232]) by sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02) with SMTP id <20030831023201mm2004eljue>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:32:01 +0000 Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:31:59 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <4C1B8D7A-DB5B-11D7-8F5D-000393030CE6@insightbb.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Variable Scope From: LingWitt@insightbb.com I was sincere. I meant "modern" to mean more recent. Though, I do agree with the correlation between your interpretation and response. I apologize. On Saturday, Aug 30, 2003, at 21:44 America/New_York, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > On Saturday, August 30, 2003, at 09:12 PM, LingWitt@insightbb.com > wrote: > >> I thank you for your open-mindedness, but I must admit I was in the >> fault. I supplied a version from a modern language such as C++. > > No need to be a dick about it. Calling C++ 'modern' is about as > sensible as calling C 'ancient'. Plenty of applications and operating > systems are still written in C (not C++). Apache, PHP, Perl, Linux > and FreeBSD are some examples. Rasmus responded correctly to your > question by noting that PHP's for() syntax is identical to C's for() > syntax. Which it is.