Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:43007 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24127 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2009 19:31:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Feb 2009 19:31:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kenashkov@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kenashkov@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.132.245 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kenashkov@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.132.245 an-out-0708.google.com Received: from [209.85.132.245] ([209.85.132.245:29837] helo=an-out-0708.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A0/55-12172-79723994 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:31:36 -0500 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so187181anc.38 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:31:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oMQXjsjN36a8dowNTuAzP8LTMDVK9woD9GcD0Hq0saE=; b=kuVXboZw0yeYy2dL9wir56c8lFpn8IAJMZSAkd1ywllzCVLOIDq0V2CHMxMkrZTfX3 t1VGgIEZhXBj+Bzuyg6UbnGxzV+h326tb0fQr1KTBlPEwrhwMCp5k7+VRmoqh9ArHcI1 Y8Rzuh8zujRFSl5I7slpRcrbFJFQ1tSDtpdlg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sbbvsEE1NfxBITMBKOomM9gF6Ztc/CYiaoKc9Cz4OGJ5RGcXu3oO82PEE7+6Zu8Zv7 CuI40+TT2QqoTBL47nsi0/8Uve3lh4HaPaW6YdAd6WzXuqGPmIjAVulPVZNSFfWF/Ypk HX7RImcAaJiSJzPw5EyIN8QT5JNJBnJ5zjjso= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.143.14 with SMTP id q14mr4388910wfd.213.1234380690010; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:31:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <00d401c98c7e$a92bfcd0$919f644d@foxbox> References: <53C9D049-8C10-48F2-8312-C8A81D2B5990@pooteeweet.org> <00a601c98c7b$4ed5a4a0$919f644d@foxbox> <7f3ed2c30902111113q364b4094q22c71c1046a984a6@mail.gmail.com> <00c301c98c7d$da9cce80$919f644d@foxbox> <00d401c98c7e$a92bfcd0$919f644d@foxbox> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:31:29 +0200 Message-ID: <261daaa10902111131u61ad7ec9s9257a45e1e11f086@mail.gmail.com> To: Steph Fox Cc: Hannes Magnusson , Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd312a68bb4ef0462a9a602 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3 todos From: kenashkov@gmail.com (Vesselin Kenashkov) --000e0cd312a68bb4ef0462a9a602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit IMHO listing new functions is useful - there could be a name collision with a function in users code (I know it is improbable, because the functions are named extname_funcname, but still possible) On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Steph Fox wrote: > > But this was actually an add-on after I put the initial 5.1 upgrading >> guide >> together. A 200-line document became a 500-line document overnight, and >> voila - nobody reads the thing. >> > > Actually I'm wrong - that was 5.2. The 5.1 upgrade guide appears to be > as-was. > > So again, why are we listing new extensions, functions and class constants? > > > - Steph > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Vesselin Kenashkov developer at www.webstudiobulgaria.com --000e0cd312a68bb4ef0462a9a602--