Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42994 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53256 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2009 14:33:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Feb 2009 14:33:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@prohost.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@prohost.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain prohost.org from 74.125.44.28 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@prohost.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.44.28 yx-out-2324.google.com Received: from [74.125.44.28] ([74.125.44.28:53931] helo=yx-out-2324.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/68-12172-4B1E2994 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:33:24 -0500 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so100575yxb.83 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.160.5 with SMTP id m5mr2943858qbo.100.1234362801566; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:33:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.111? (TOROON63-1176059019.sdsl.bell.ca [70.25.60.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm2534625qbw.15.2009.02.11.06.33.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:33:21 -0800 (PST) Cc: Eric Stewart , internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: To: Christian Schneider In-Reply-To: <4992E00A.9010209@cschneid.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:33:19 -0500 References: <4992E00A.9010209@cschneid.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: RFC for new INI's From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) On 11-Feb-09, at 9:26 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Eric Stewart wrote: >> A new RFC for PHP's proposed INI files have been added to the wiki. >> Below is >> a direct link to the page. >> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/newinis > > Good work IMHO. > > Similar to what Karsten Dambekalns wrote I think we should only have a > difference between devel and production for display/logging options, > but > not for options changing the 'behaviour' of PHP. > > So I'd propose > allow_call_time_pass_reference = Off (devel) / On (production) > display_errors = On (devel) / Off (production) > display_startup_errors = On (devel) / Off (production) > html_errors = On (devel) / Off (production) > session.bug_compat_warn = On (devel) / Off (production) > track_errors = On (devel) / Off (production) > > but > output_buffering = 4096 ; Changes header()/compression filter > behaviour I think it makes sense to have it on in both. > register_argc_argv = Off ; Why should devel have access if prod > doesn't? off in both. > request_order = GPCS ; Why should devel/production differ? > session.bug_compat_42 = Off ; Why should devel/production differ? > Agreed. Ilia Alshanetsky