Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42985 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41298 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2009 11:54:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Feb 2009 11:54:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rquadling@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rquadling@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.134.190 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rquadling@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.134.190 mu-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.134.190] ([209.85.134.190:18528] helo=mu-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 11/83-12172-A0B61994 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:54:50 -0500 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so1539891mue.3 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:54:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0msW19xrTthv/KqJVUKisG6IWfkM+FTd1wBFbOerAdY=; b=gg0/XLLemOKF+SyW5RXVAwSREzAmFRroWaCbb1ywwpNiGOtq1Vu33WtB9VqZHiWcM4 T0nl6ZT2AFp9Jr0hrnc666/rxHH+LZpHmpnoYahqr3T03z/BvRWA2eDUgy/CtIppHeXp IuP8xMYNm2o6oBmOjYuWrjpyReHUY5Z08EzmU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lvy7WX3zxRgv8lzDsdkCapzVPjSUod5zpZjNlL8SB5X5bAcNjtXit6xgVTcwHVXTj0 lXrBVYENbhGPep6xsxPsJriO+kNfPhVMQfZ1sa1IXlayBWNqSsLR4X1RWwXOmabUMY2Z asoq7x6drCN1DmJYBYZtWUBId5pACFze6c/z8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.222.1 with SMTP id z1mr898576muq.121.1234266887221; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:54:47 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: RQuadling@googlemail.com In-Reply-To: <10845a340902100350v42637ad2vadbfdc552c42d982@mail.gmail.com> References: <10845a340902100350v42637ad2vadbfdc552c42d982@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:54:47 +0000 Message-ID: <10845a340902100354s14809a69x28ab0badfdb803ad@mail.gmail.com> To: Karsten Dambekalns Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: RFC for new INI's From: rquadling@googlemail.com (Richard Quadling) 2009/2/10 Richard Quadling : > 2009/2/10 Karsten Dambekalns : >> Hi Eric. >> >> On 10.02.2009 3:27 Uhr, Eric Stewart wrote: >>> >>> A new RFC for PHP's proposed INI files have been added to the wiki. Below >>> is >>> a direct link to the page. >>> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/newinis >> >> I love the settings for production, but I think you reversed the meaning of >> allow_call_time_pass_reference - if it is allowed no warning will be issued. >> So, to make your intention of >> >> ---- >> ; Default Value: On (Issue warnings) >> ; Development Value: On (Issue warnings) >> ; Production Value: Off (Suppress warnings) >> ---- >> >> work, you need to write that the other way around - 'Off' means 'issue >> warnings'... It is: >> Development Value: Off (Issue warnings) >> Production Value: On (Suppress warnings) >> >> >> In production session.bug_compat_42 is off, but according to the "summary" >> you want it to be on for development (so that warnings about it are shown, I >> assume). In the development php.ini the actual values for both settings are >> off, though. >> >> >> And I am not sure about register_argc_argv having different values in both >> files. I understand ot being off in production for speed reasons, but if it >> "just works" in development and "suddenly stops working" in production... >> But that's a minor issues. >> >> All in all like the proposed settings! >> >> Regards, >> Karsten >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > Regarding ... > "; Section headers (e.g. [Foo]) are also silently ignored, even though > ; they might mean something in the future." > > This is no longer true. See http://docs.php.net/manual/en/ini.sections.php > > I would suggest changing this to ... > > "; Section headers (e.g. [Foo]) are also silently ignored, even though > ; they might mean something in the future. The exception to this rule is > ; section headers starting with [HOST= and [PATH= > ; See : http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.sections.php" > > Regards, > > Richard Quadling. > -- > ----- > Richard Quadling > Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 > "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!" > Better grammar. "; Section headers (e.g. [Foo]) are also silently ignored, even though ; they might mean something in the future. The exceptions to this rule are ; section headers starting with [HOST= or [PATH= ; See : http://www.php.net/manual/en/ini.sections.php" -- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"