Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:4289 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85674 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Aug 2003 19:15:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85597 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2003 19:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zend.com) (192.117.235.230) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2003 19:14:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 26963 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2003 19:14:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO andi-laptop.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Aug 2003 19:14:58 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030830221230.03353d80@127.0.0.1> X-Sender: andi@127.0.0.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 22:14:21 +0300 To: "Rob Richards" Cc: In-Reply-To: <01d901c36efe$9558d000$06dea8c0@cyberware.local> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030830155931.0395a758@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.2.20030830155931.0395a758@127.0.0.1> <5.1.0.14.2.20030830161302.04623998@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Problem with CVS From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) At 09:56 AM 8/30/2003 -0400, Rob Richards wrote: >From: Andi Gutmans > > Ouch. Now the question is how do we solve this? Do we make ./configure >bail > > out on such versions or do we hack something into PHP so that it doesn't > > call this function more than once? > > I really want to reduce the block size in my mem manager from 256KB to >16KB > > but I can't do it right now because it kills PHP quicker (it will die in > > any case but it will take longer). > >Do you know what happens if another apache mod were to be using libxml >(there are some)? Would they be sharing the same space as in, if the other >mod were to change libxml globals, would that affect the libxml globals >within the php scope? I believe they would clash but dont know for sure. They probably would. >If so, then libxml 2.5.8 would have to be marked bad unless you can also >know when the other mods call their cleanup. This is a 2.5.8 issue only as >it was introduce in that version and fixed in 2.5.9. Can someone who knows configure well please add a check and bail out on 2.5.8? Thanks, Andi