Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42591 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94296 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2009 22:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jan 2009 22:19:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.116 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.116 us-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.116] ([63.205.162.116:44512] helo=us-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 57/0F-10913-A02CB694 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:19:55 -0500 Received: from [192.168.16.104] ([192.168.16.104]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:20:41 -0800 Message-ID: <496BC207.5000202@zend.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:19:51 -0800 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP internals References: <1112172038.20090112222233@marcus-boerger.de> <1567641978.20090112230428@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <1567641978.20090112230428@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2009 22:20:41.0792 (UTC) FILETIME=[013DDC00:01C97504] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] status update for beta1 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > it appears Dmitry and Stas are against that, so I let it for you to > decide whetehr you want me to drop all of it or continue workig on it > to make all I can ready for 5.3.0. I'm not precisely against it because I'm not even sure what "it" is. Is there a RFC/proposal somewhere that describes in detail what is proposed to be done - i.e. what is the delta to the original closures RFC? Unless I missed something (which certainly could be what is happening, especially given I was on vacation for some time and may have missed something when I was catching up) there is some substantive change to closures which is not obvious and changes how they work and we don't understand it sufficiently. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com