Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42529
Return-Path: <dmitry@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 15528 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2009 12:57:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jan 2009 12:57:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1
Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:28488] helo=il-gw1.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 30/AC-41481-7A6A4694 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:57:13 -0500
Received: from [10.1.10.2] ([10.1.10.2]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:57:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4964A69F.2060103@zend.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:57:03 +0300
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
CC: internals@lists.php.net, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org>, 
 =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= <johannes@php.net>
References: <272365052.20090104173130@marcus-boerger.de>
In-Reply-To: <272365052.20090104173130@marcus-boerger.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2009 12:57:52.0425 (UTC) FILETIME=[8D10A190:01C970C7]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Closures, Lambdas and use
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

Personally I like the current syntax more and don't see any reason to 
change it.

Thanks. Dmitry.

Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Internals, Dmitry, Lukas, Johannes,
> 
>   some time back (August 08) I complained about 'use' being at a weird
> position and not at the same place as 'global' or 'static' where I
> expected it. Back then Dmitry asked me to provide a patch to check out
> the alternative. Now during the holidys I finally found some time to
> change from:
>        $f = function() use ($x) {}
> to:
>        $f = function() { use $x; }
> 
> Patch is attached.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Best regards,
>  Marcus
>