Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42329 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93520 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2008 12:30:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Dec 2008 12:30:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=scott@macvicar.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=scott@macvicar.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain macvicar.net from 193.227.246.108 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: scott@macvicar.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.227.246.108 ip246-108-v193.static.x-ip.net Received: from [193.227.246.108] ([193.227.246.108:50009] helo=lovelace.midden.org.uk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AD/B1-18353-C624A494 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:30:37 -0500 Received: from office.vbulletin.com ([217.155.246.60] helo=[10.0.0.116]) by lovelace.midden.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LDI1P-0002Kb-HT; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:30:34 +0000 Message-ID: <494A4259.9030604@macvicar.net> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:30:17 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RQuadling@GoogleMail.com CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <10845a340812180420w1ed3cd51lfc416d9a15b7df52@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <10845a340812180420w1ed3cd51lfc416d9a15b7df52@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 X-Spam_Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "lovelace.midden.org.uk", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Richard Quadling wrote: > Hi. > > With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this? > > In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have > been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972. > > So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34 > seconds behind UTC? > > Regards, > [...] Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 2008 is 1s longer than normal. From: scott@macvicar.net (Scott MacVicar) Richard Quadling wrote: > Hi. > > With 2008 having a leap-second, does PHP handle this? > > In looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second, there have > been quite a few leap seconds - 34 since Jan 1st 1972. > > So, if PHP isn't making any changes does this mean PHP time is 34 > seconds behind UTC? > > Regards, > PHP does what most operating systems and ignores the leap seconds. Scott