Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42061 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12665 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2008 19:46:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2008 19:46:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:54543] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/B6-12977-877AD294 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:46:01 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A6211F6E1; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:45:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:45:53 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1628519147.20081126204553@marcus-boerger.de> To: Scott MacVicar CC: Marcus Boerger , Stanislav Malyshev , Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Internals In-Reply-To: References: <36F14278-2896-40E1-971C-E488E890EAF7@pooteeweet.org> <492D232D.5090503@macvicar.net> <63F9B105-803B-4DD6-97E9-C656069FD181@pooteeweet.org> <492D900B.7020308@zend.com> <1323243616.20081126195630@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] apha3 From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Scott, Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 8:33:59 PM, you wrote: > On 26 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Marcus Boerger wrote: >> Hello Stanislav, >> >> why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash? >> >> Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote: >> >>> Hi! >> >>>> Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to >>>> determine if >>>> the extension is loaded, so I guess yeah .. lets just remove it .. >>>> we >>>> are expecting people to update their code. >> >>> If we have function-level BC - why not just add stub extension with >>> dependency on hash. > I looked at this but php.h would want to include a mhash header file, > at least I think that's what it was from memory. That's one solution, the other is to reqister that stub extension from MINIT of the hash extension and be done (can all be done in hash.c). Best regards, Marcus