Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:42056 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96539 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2008 18:56:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Nov 2008 18:56:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:36145] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 97/73-12977-5EB9D294 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:56:38 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A2D11F6AC; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:56:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:56:30 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1323243616.20081126195630@marcus-boerger.de> To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , Scott MacVicar , PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <492D900B.7020308@zend.com> References: <36F14278-2896-40E1-971C-E488E890EAF7@pooteeweet.org> <492D232D.5090503@macvicar.net> <63F9B105-803B-4DD6-97E9-C656069FD181@pooteeweet.org> <492D900B.7020308@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] apha3 From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Stanislav, why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash? Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote: > Hi! >> Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to determine if >> the extension is loaded, so I guess yeah .. lets just remove it .. we >> are expecting people to update their code. > If we have function-level BC - why not just add stub extension with > dependency on hash? > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com Best regards, Marcus