Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41972 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1583 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2008 12:35:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Nov 2008 12:35:41 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.229.41.14 border-g21.inqnet.at Received: from [213.229.41.14] ([213.229.41.14:27500] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BA/33-17095-C1561294 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:35:40 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Lukas Kahwe Smith Message-ID: <49216518.1050805@php.net> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:35:36 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> <20232373-26A5-4159-8195-7B35181CF4B6@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <20232373-26A5-4159-8195-7B35181CF4B6@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 213.229.41.14 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] quick polls for 5.3 (sorry missed a couple votes, but they did not affect the results) From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner) Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > 7) should Output buffering rewrite MFH? this one comes with some > baggage, we need enough people to actually have a look at how things are > in HEAD and make it clear that they will be available for bug fixing and > BC issues resolving. the risk here is obviously that any BC issues will > be hard to isolate for end users. > > -1 Lukas > -1 David > +1 Hannes > +0 Matt Wilson > +0 Greg > +0 Derick > +1 Elizabeth > +0 Lars > -1 Stas for now Need more explanation why we need rewrite, what the > rewrite does, etc. If there's a good reason and maintainer, then maybe +1. > -1 Ilia > +0.5 Steph I'd really like to see it in 5.3 because it was supposed to > fix several OB issues, but it's probably too late in the cycle now > +0 Scott > +1 Kalle > -1 David S.P. for now Need more explanation why we need rewrite, what > the rewrite does, etc. If there's a good reason and maintainer, then > maybe +1. > -1 Rob > +1 Pierre (if it creates non fixable issues during the alpha/RC phases, > it can always be reverted. However the code is much cleaner and easier > to maintain, if I can use the word "easy" for the OB code) > +0 Arnaud Le Blanc > +0 Larry Garfield > +0 Lester Caine > +0 Konstantin Leboev > +1 Jani > +0 Jonathan Bond-Caron > +0 George Antoniadis > +1 Felipe > +1 Moriyoshi > +0 Karsten Dambekalns > +0 Alexey Zakhlestin > +1 Guilherme Blanco > +1 Marcus > > => no MFH, very unclear vote result and nobody that raised their hand to > take responsibility (yes Pierre I know that you raised your hand on IRC) Hm... I'm still alive, but I feel blamed for not reading a mailing list which has become unmanageable to read. I wrote the code, so I'm probably "responsible" for it, too. And again, I was asked several times to back port it, so it can be included in 5.3--which doesn't mean I'm insisting on that matter, just to make it clear. I've still got some email addresses which--despite of spam--I am able to read and respond in a reasonable time span. Usually you can even hit me on IRC. Feel free to ask me any questions per mail or on IRC, but don't expect me to read a quadrillion of mails on internals@. Cheers, Mike