Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41886 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 464 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2008 21:31:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2008 21:31:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.228 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.228 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.228] ([209.85.198.228:26662] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 11/98-07308-E1B4B194 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:31:10 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so587126rvb.23 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:31:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=NjU8Xd8PTDRZZ78jwRO3iKIhJpAuc7WKlh9Da8U9L2k=; b=AjxE8svNrNo2IJRefBrcBQfznd4rTMFH7IwVoF2zrZd4nnwkvyQt+rNIlMWIYGb1c6 mzd1oX/qhTHGVKLftirn7vIIGvmKKuoYOy09Seq68QHp/ZTWlHQlOZBeFEeeVerJrrSY DLo9Pa9lDqLHGLDSG6bvLRrDQyInbnOkRFksg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=uFQrEdtSUZNhubI4i80QqZUi8HYE9U98GfCuzJ4vJh1ZHObT3R4AwcJBWzVja9p6lw MxWZbeNPRBGeu2miBOVboeUs76+np78Azpla1NzPVTXO0u2X5w9s39gRqnzwY45B8GEW gaVxlOEwPxSbyXRioxh7YE9w6oh189cSUMLwY= Received: by 10.141.168.2 with SMTP id v2mr5100643rvo.207.1226525466361; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.165.15 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:31:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:31:06 +0100 To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" Cc: "internals Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] quick polls for 5.3 From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") hi Lukas! Thanks for this nice little list, 1st class troll killer :) On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > 1) ext/mhash in 5.3. ext/hash has all the functions, so the entire BC break > will be that "if (extension_loaded('mhash'))" will need fixing if mhash is > removed (answer both) > II) remove ext/mhash +1 > 2) deprecate ereg*. ext/ereg is an extension as of PHP 5.3. Since ext/ereg > is more or less redundant with ext/preg and is likely to not get much > unicode love for PHP 6, the question is if we should mark it with a > E_DEPRECATED in PHP 5.3 +1 > 3) resource constants (choose one) > c) Document as is +1 > 4) keep ext/phar enabled by default in 5.3? 0 > 5) keep ext/sqlite3 enabled by default in 5.3? +1 > 6) enable mysqlnd by default in 5.3? (answer both) > II) also enable ext/mysql, mysqli und pdo_mysql by default since there will > be no external dependencies in this case +1 > 7) should Output buffering rewrite MFH? this one comes with some baggage, we > need enough people to actually have a look at how things are in HEAD and > make it clear that they will be available for bug fixing and BC issues > resolving. the risk here is obviously that any BC issues will be hard to > isolate for end users. +1 (if it creates non fixable issues during the alpha/RC phases, it can always be reverted. However the code is much cleaner and easier to maintain, if I can use the word "easy" for the OB code) > 8) MFH mcrypt cleanups in HEAD. either the make sense or they dont, so > either (choose one) > b) MFH to 5.3 +1 (there is tests, there is people taking of it if there are issues, more tests can be added as wish, it removes duplicate codes) Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org