Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41878 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74249 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2008 20:04:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2008 20:04:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@prohost.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@prohost.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain prohost.org from 74.125.92.27 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@prohost.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.92.27 qw-out-2122.google.com Received: from [74.125.92.27] ([74.125.92.27:61969] helo=qw-out-2122.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 77/63-07308-3E63B194 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:04:51 -0500 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so312501qwh.59 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.183.6 with SMTP id g6mr9104422qbf.17.1226520287145; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.139? (TOROON63-1176059019.sdsl.bell.ca [70.25.60.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k29sm16274889qba.7.2008.11.12.12.04.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:04:45 -0800 (PST) Cc: internals Mailing List Message-ID: To: Lukas Kahwe Smith In-Reply-To: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:04:44 -0500 References: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] quick polls for 5.3 From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) On 12-Nov-08, at 2:14 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Hi, > > here are a few questions that need to be answered ASAP. > > If at all possible keep your votes as short as possible. I think all > of the above topics have been discussed quite a lot on the list. So > I hope voters can spare the list needless repetition. Instead if you > think that a topic needs to be discussed, put a short note in your > vote under the given topic. If a number of people also think the > topic needs more discussion, then we can open a new thread dedicated > to this topic later this week. > > 1) ext/mhash in 5.3. ext/hash has all the functions, so the entire > BC break will be that "if (extension_loaded('mhash'))" will need > fixing if mhash is removed (answer both) > I) enable ext/hash by default > II) remove ext/mhash +1 (for both) > 2) deprecate ereg*. ext/ereg is an extension as of PHP 5.3. Since > ext/ereg is more or less redundant with ext/preg and is likely to > not get much unicode love for PHP 6, the question is if we should > mark it with a E_DEPRECATED in PHP 5.3 +1 > 3) resource constants (choose one) > a) Should we deprecate constant resources (mostly used to emulate > STDIN and friends) > b) Should we instead just throw an E_STRICT > c) Document as is (c) +1 > 4) keep ext/phar enabled by default in 5.3? -0 > 5) keep ext/sqlite3 enabled by default in 5.3? +1 > 6) enable mysqlnd by default in 5.3? (answer both) > I) enable mysqlnd by default > II) also enable ext/mysql, mysqli und pdo_mysql by default since > there will be no external dependencies in this case -1 for all > > 7) should Output buffering rewrite MFH? this one comes with some > baggage, we need enough people to actually have a look at how things > are in HEAD and make it clear that they will be available for bug > fixing and BC issues resolving. the risk here is obviously that any > BC issues will be hard to isolate for end users. -1 > > 8) MFH mcrypt cleanups in HEAD. either the make sense or they dont, > so either (choose one) > a) revert in HEAD > b) MFH to 5.3 +1 (b) Ilia Alshanetsky