Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41873 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65281 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2008 19:30:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2008 19:30:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 74.125.92.25 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.92.25 qw-out-2122.google.com Received: from [74.125.92.25] ([74.125.92.25:52095] helo=qw-out-2122.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C9/91-07308-9DE2B194 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:30:37 -0500 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so301319qwh.59 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.155.7 with SMTP id h7mr9079652qbo.58.1226518227856; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:30:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pcp062987pcs.unl.edu (pcp062987pcs.unl.edu [129.93.125.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm16279028qba.3.2008.11.12.11.30.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:30:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <491B2ED0.6010901@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:30:24 -0600 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070807) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: internals Mailing List References: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: quick polls for 5.3 From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Greg Beaver) Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Hi, > > here are a few questions that need to be answered ASAP. > > If at all possible keep your votes as short as possible. I think all of > the above topics have been discussed quite a lot on the list. So I hope > voters can spare the list needless repetition. Instead if you think that > a topic needs to be discussed, put a short note in your vote under the > given topic. If a number of people also think the topic needs more > discussion, then we can open a new thread dedicated to this topic later > this week. > > 1) ext/mhash in 5.3. ext/hash has all the functions, so the entire BC > break will be that "if (extension_loaded('mhash'))" will need fixing if > mhash is removed (answer both) > I) enable ext/hash by default +1 > II) remove ext/mhash +0 (no opinion) > 2) deprecate ereg*. ext/ereg is an extension as of PHP 5.3. Since > ext/ereg is more or less redundant with ext/preg and is likely to not > get much unicode love for PHP 6, the question is if we should mark it > with a E_DEPRECATED in PHP 5.3 +1 > 3) resource constants (choose one) > a) Should we deprecate constant resources (mostly used to emulate STDIN > and friends) > b) Should we instead just throw an E_STRICT > c) Document as is C) +1 > 4) keep ext/phar enabled by default in 5.3? +1 > 5) keep ext/sqlite3 enabled by default in 5.3? +1 > 6) enable mysqlnd by default in 5.3? (answer both) > I) enable mysqlnd by default +0 (no opinion) > II) also enable ext/mysql, mysqli und pdo_mysql by default since there > will be no external dependencies in this case +0 (no opinion) > 7) should Output buffering rewrite MFH? this one comes with some > baggage, we need enough people to actually have a look at how things are > in HEAD and make it clear that they will be available for bug fixing and > BC issues resolving. the risk here is obviously that any BC issues will > be hard to isolate for end users. +0 (no opinion) > 8) MFH mcrypt cleanups in HEAD. either the make sense or they dont, so > either (choose one) > a) revert in HEAD > b) MFH to 5.3 +0 (no opinion) Greg