Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41869 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59807 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2008 19:26:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2008 19:26:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=david.coallier@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=david.coallier@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.200.173 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: david.coallier@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.200.173 wf-out-1314.google.com Received: from [209.85.200.173] ([209.85.200.173:19724] helo=wf-out-1314.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B5/50-07308-CCD2B194 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:26:04 -0500 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 26so531026wfd.26 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:25:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=1OkVUc5m1/1DQPL4zpym8Ti/AsP6VFcl1+FiVEqsUvc=; b=jxqAUwQxpe1+HgIoylulz54hFjDmdTU5/iyw2fw1Sg+xzgE/swZQT/APSbT71hX0r3 eb9EWfnPgu4dB/PTYB/ehnpVAKjnJCTFoi+fkTG7bcLT93f8BJv9GwsFECyey/DFUJ3q v/+Y3TK80H3HrRX0RjA7BTUnJai8H/565ygFs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=V+eqJ9yfacoLp5V/kr7GfNxTjMS2tblDAMlruC67dnhJzPAp3ZWRIkoku0b/2PlS0S FbJqArd7uRIcU2mfk85p6wVLgID73q6HYCaDhXmGhk00pa38/P55nIIgoWT4u00vLTMV 8f+ik9T/62v6H0dG3xw4UwEtW1RYld3kQBsc4= Received: by 10.143.42.6 with SMTP id u6mr3592104wfj.121.1226517959012; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.41.4 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:25:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:25:58 +0000 Sender: david.coallier@gmail.com To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" Cc: "internals Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <42D56477-0E39-4548-B711-A950480E562E@pooteeweet.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 058512fa4fa6295e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] quick polls for 5.3 From: davidc@php.net ("David Coallier") > 1) ext/mhash in 5.3. ext/hash has all the functions, so the entire BC break > will be that "if (extension_loaded('mhash'))" will need fixing if mhash is > removed (answer both) > I) enable ext/hash by default +1 > II) remove ext/mhash +1 > 2) deprecate ereg*. ext/ereg is an extension as of PHP 5.3. Since ext/ereg > is more or less redundant with ext/preg and is likely to not get much > unicode love for PHP 6, the question is if we should mark it with a > E_DEPRECATED in PHP 5.3 +1 > 3) resource constants (choose one) > c) Document as is +1 > 4) keep ext/phar enabled by default in 5.3? +1 > 5) keep ext/sqlite3 enabled by default in 5.3? +1 > 6) enable mysqlnd by default in 5.3? (answer both) > I) enable mysqlnd by default I'd say personally +1 because I have it enabled everywhere already but thinking in a larger user base where not everyone is using mysql I have to say -1 > II) also enable ext/mysql, mysqli und pdo_mysql by default since there will > be no external dependencies in this case +1 if it ends up turned on by default, -1 otherwise. > 7) should Output buffering rewrite MFH? this one comes with some baggage, we > need enough people to actually have a look at how things are in HEAD and > make it clear that they will be available for bug fixing and BC issues > resolving. the risk here is obviously that any BC issues will be hard to > isolate for end users. -1 > 8) MFH mcrypt cleanups in HEAD. either the make sense or they dont, so > either (choose one) > b) MFH to 5.3 +1 -- Slan, David