Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41781 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68311 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2008 17:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Nov 2008 17:18:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.224 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.224 rv-out-0506.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.224] ([209.85.198.224:38345] helo=rv-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AC/A3-61271-55B17194 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:18:13 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2088078rvb.23 for ; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:18:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Xn+NASby2pKqpqIbVlfBZhNLxIJakx2YrpRmAeUXgsM=; b=Apz4qsUFWUWB7c4X4ej/gtRhI4dYV5fkc0AAqwZQvFul5ff36Q8D1MfU4y2/2VoPg+ N7yUMVh6iXDFyWv4a7q2vSUlHnyDpxsbLZ6scXUmdkPCB6JSbFwNN2WgqDSRvLegd2ku dcLGNM5ZuDLHTgMzfIeOvzsXipVbwuAkFbmYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=jqS3OkTCT7dAFGwddh8rYFFs0+Ql6OSPfVL7BSp+R8imoMuY1niouAt9qYA5xLbUIy liGg1xEaiDPqdM7PWXnGiscS8MxPF43qAIHMx3/0Zw6syFAIjDJSPg0QNOCCR1Vl7Jn1 dTmsFP19j9TTovoPBX5Cr8iS3e1n6QopQogWI= Received: by 10.140.136.5 with SMTP id j5mr3060667rvd.167.1226251090724; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.178.14 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 09:18:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:18:10 +0100 To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?M._Karpel=E8s?=" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1226219947.1712.632.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <5a5ca6800811081437r6af527b9rc590fc561a26ec57@mail.gmail.com> <1226219947.1712.632.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Where to send small enhancement patch for openssl module of PHP 5.2.6 ? From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") hi, On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:39 AM, M. Karpel=E8s wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > If you have time to look at his bug, maybe you'll also have time to look > at my one-line patch also related to OpenSSL ? > > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D46127 > > I really don't know if I'm being ignored or what, but every time I write > something for PHP, it gets nowhere (see: bug #46073 and #46496), to the > point I'm thinking of creating my own branch of PHP with my own patches. It is more a matter of availability. I will take a look at them too. > So, is that my own impression, or is it just that everybody is just too > worried with choices of namespace separators (yeah I also have an > opinion about this, but it's not relevant to the scope of this mail) or > whatever? Namespace discussions are irrelevant in any other feature requests. --=20 Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org