Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41665 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78079 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2008 21:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Nov 2008 21:56:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mls@pooteeweet.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mls@pooteeweet.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pooteeweet.org from 88.198.8.16 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mls@pooteeweet.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 88.198.8.16 bigtime.backendmedia.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [88.198.8.16] ([88.198.8.16:34369] helo=bigtime.backendmedia.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/E2-15458-625C0194 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:56:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by bigtime.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938A74144058; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 21:57:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at backendmedia.com Received: from bigtime.backendmedia.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bigtime.backendmedia.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBoJTVu+-tK5; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:57:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.151] (77-58-151-147.dclient.hispeed.ch [77.58.151.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mls@pooteeweet.org) by bigtime.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CFE4144009; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:57:39 +0100 (CET) To: Stan Vassilev | FM In-Reply-To: <3F3445975B55414BB4A214B32E178657@pc> X-Priority: 3 References: <4900DB81.4000805@zend.com> <4900E150.1010607@dynom.nl> <49018FC3.90302@gmail.com> <1224854888.19390.89.camel@goldfinger.johannes.nop> <490609A1.7090400@gravitonic.com> <1225199800.878.0.camel@localhost> <3F3445975B55414BB4A214B32E178657@pc> Message-ID: <4A4FE9BC-F000-4AEE-A68C-8EFEA9DCD154@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:55:48 +0100 Cc: "PHP Internals" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] array_key_exists BC break From: mls@pooteeweet.org (Lukas Kahwe Smith) On 28.10.2008, at 15:33, Stan Vassilev | FM wrote: >>> I would say "no" for 5.3. But for 6 it would be fantastic to have >>> all array-related >>> operations supporting ArrayAccess interface, where possible. >> >> +1 for this. >> >> Hi, >> cu, Lars > > Just making sure but: I think the BC break should be fixed. It's > breaking actual code out there. The practice of passing traversable > objects to our views, mixed with real arrays, is already common (I > do it too). so where do we stand here? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith mls@pooteeweet.org