Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41610 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11091 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2008 08:45:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Nov 2008 08:45:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=larry@garfieldtech.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=larry@garfieldtech.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain garfieldtech.com from 76.96.30.48 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: larry@garfieldtech.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 76.96.30.48 qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net Received: from [76.96.30.48] ([76.96.30.48:60766] helo=QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9D/47-00587-3471C094 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:45:56 -0500 Received: from OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.52]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ZkiJ1a00317UAYkA5klsvD; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:45:52 +0000 Received: from earth.ufp ([24.13.255.226]) by OMTA13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zklr1a0094trKQ88ZklsaR; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:45:52 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=EdOmzomn-b4A:10 a=XquZctQdcbcA:10 a=hDNBeQ1lcSs7ZIK8ETQA:9 a=rOIzYXxCzC4KotDt-AgA:7 a=ADWArsC_cfCEewuVqcCaAZ1Pb7AA:4 a=FHBbIDN7CdwA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth.ufp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79750D7A39 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:45:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from earth.ufp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (earth.ufp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAaq+zkbCKrF for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:45:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from luna (unknown [192.168.42.1]) by earth.ufp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B62E6D7A13 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:45:50 -0500 (CDT) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:45:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <2077BA98-A58A-4EBD-8088-413654E878BC@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <2077BA98-A58A-4EBD-8088-413654E878BC@pooteeweet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200811010345.48823.larry@garfieldtech.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] keeping traffic on this list manageable From: larry@garfieldtech.com (Larry Garfield) On Friday 31 October 2008 1:23:12 pm Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Here I come to the key part of my idea. We would allow every PHP > usergroup to also appoint one person that gets unmoderated access to > the list. This enables members of the usergroup to feed their ideas > via that person directly to the list, taking load of the list > moderators and ensuring that things a given UG deem important are not > lost in this process. Furthermore this intermediate step would serve > to throttle the traffic and make the numbers of posters (their writing > style and expertise) more easily transparent to other posters (but > more importantly to the readers). I am sure this will help reduce > misunderstandings and more importantly result in a more friendly tone > (its just natural for people to feel overwhelmed by too large a crowd). My concern here is that an UG is not necessarily a good=20 representative "constituency". As an example, I don't think there's anyone= =20 else from the Chicago UG on this list right now; certainly no one I=20 recognize. Most of the local PHPers aren't interested in internals as far = as=20 I'm aware, for whatever reason. =20 However, my main activity is with the Drupal project. More than half of th= e=20 posts I make are related to how Drupal could potentially leverage new=20 features down the road. If I were to "represent" any particular group=20 and "ensure that things [it] deem[s] important", it would be Drupal, not=20 Chicago, and I think I'm one of only 2 Drupal core devs on this list. But= =20 Drupal isn't an UG, so that wouldn't qualify as a constituency. I'm sure=20 there's some other definition of constituency besides regional UG and proje= ct=20 that makes just as much sense, too. =46rom my mostly-outsider POV, most of the "noise" I see on this list is ei= ther=20 bikeshedding (which is hardly a PHP-specific problem) or people that seem t= o=20 know each other well so I assume are core folks talking past each other,=20 whether maliciously or not. I don't see anything that "keep out the=20 riff-raff" would inherently fix. Except for the recent namespace separator= =20 thread-of-doom, this list is generally much slower paced than, say,=20 php-general. =2D-=20 Larry Garfield larry@garfieldtech.com