Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41603 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22390 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 20:15:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 20:15:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.180 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.180 wa-out-1112.google.com Received: from [209.85.146.180] ([209.85.146.180:25478] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B8/BA-00587-6676B094 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:15:35 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j32so758862waf.7 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=G1gqo6t7uTOfF8JLYMBuL7pgJvteujNh2l6hneaddHE=; b=H6eGaP6kp04K6/Z0MHOnNwlE83r3mO86F+RPpEiuKqdLBEESZaQIf9R8QeNSFXQhWp 5C6N3J25wAIQb0uwYeb3T+y/WAd04eyKF1gGxHjdUCHFe2UR9JLtumOLMNuVwjpsOijC uVbrB51leoh6cfphZ5/Z8+IrUHFQSeSrIMEtA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=TQ8XzdgVr1BJFPZgxSIQ/YDE7JPAJR4/325xK1/Y3cZE5TxLy1jyKc8TS/oh1LHEkk QMOPedpHhgFr1E/HKPmWtJdWAbath041Ewn2xDvkTUqn5d3nvDWuRca+hHgUNLgznV2N 6uyrSerz4YtDOp03EvSYLAU4jDeCqMAhgzZfw= Received: by 10.115.91.11 with SMTP id t11mr10351068wal.41.1225484132480; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.148.19 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7f3ed2c30810311315k5b23000bpc1bcd388b174db48@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:15:32 +0100 To: "Daniel Brown" Cc: "Rasmus Lerdorf" , "Lukas Kahwe Smith" , "PHP Development" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2077BA98-A58A-4EBD-8088-413654E878BC@pooteeweet.org> <490B5CC5.8040808@lerdorf.com> <7f3ed2c30810311252x7c4f1cb9ydd41a273f4089311@mail.gmail.com> <490B639A.8050905@lerdorf.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] keeping traffic on this list manageable From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com ("Hannes Magnusson") On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 21:13, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >> >> This is the same as just making internals@ read-only. Once we have an >> internals-core, many core people will just unsubscribe from the internals >> list. I know I probably would. And once the core developers no longer read >> it, it becomes php-general2 and it ends up excluding people from the >> development process. > > I'd also be concerned about patch submissions. Would we leave > that on internals@ still, or create yet another list, patches@? Read the whole thread before posting please: > "external" patches and "general" discussions would still be on the > internals@ list, as it would be the main discussion list. -Hannes