Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41528
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 15648 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2008 15:03:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Oct 2008 15:03:58 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:36280] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A6/E9-00734-DD927094 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:03:58 -0500
Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E54E11F012;
	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:03:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:03:51 +0100
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1165457951.20081028160351@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net>
CC: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <49048EC1.9060908@chiaraquartet.net>
References: <49048EC1.9060908@chiaraquartet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespace separator and whining
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Greg,

  thanks for finalizing this.

marcus

Sunday, October 26, 2008, 4:37:37 PM, you wrote:

> Hi all,

> Let me make this brief: there will be lots of complaining about the
> namespace separator.

> Stop.  Now.

> It serves no possible useful purpose.  If you want to discuss why this
> was chosen or suggest alternatives, feel free to write me *off-list*.  I
> would be more than happy to answer any questions about the technical
> aspects of various choices.  The decision is made, now I suggest
> everyone get busy actually trying it out.  You will very quickly
> understand why it is a very viable choice.

> Thanks,
> Greg




Best regards,
 Marcus