Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41498
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=Cv9/bgGMljSR62OyhpZQgWCC/Mrd5iC2MSCykM3080seYBJbeePkgwoPW0yXm0IyPp
         p6LS6pAGcHAKxnX2t4oHy3I/nLky+rANuKA263GhrIF821rJzqpuqOTMkAHr6Ms4ik5o
         DJ9GE29yIkeIisLAbhnGE7SgMhm1P8DOa1axA=
Message-ID: <d4ad84b50810280018o2844cf90p8698846d7bfa494a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:18:09 +0200
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3lafur_Waage?=" <olafurw@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <8c35d7690810270850r7d53e40fvfdc1fd7e78030d6b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <64B4CECA-980F-4738-8B05-E7935741D7BB@pooteeweet.org>
	 <322434106.20080827234712@marcus-boerger.de>
	 <1219885057.5961.13.camel@pena>
	 <7f3ed2c30808272332m3066d1e5s677bb91f4b80c4b5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <48B6E3A8.8030903@zend.com>
	 <7f3ed2c30808291243x3ca7133cl5e15353368b25480@mail.gmail.com>
	 <48B85548.1030608@zend.com>
	 <99cd336d0810270813p44f2ee7fke3734ff45f4be5a4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1225121482.6991.20.camel@goldfinger.johannes.nop>
	 <8c35d7690810270850r7d53e40fvfdc1fd7e78030d6b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] alpha2 scheduled
From: mapopa@gmail.com ("marius popa")

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:50 PM, =D3lafur Waage <olafurw@gmail.com> wrote:
> I found that he had one valid question that i would like to see answered.
>
>> is the below allowed ?
>>
>> $bar =3D new Module \ Foo \ Bar();
Don't know i never saw something so ugly since c++ templates syntax
I find it funny that php is designed by committee and no one listen to
the community
And the team continues even if is an bad decision (they call it
technical one) if you see it from the point of view of syntax elegance
it's not so pretty  even c++ looks better .
It doesn't make sense if you compare it with modern languages
and my vote is -1
[End of rant]

>>
>> I find it easier to read than with out the space.
maybe it should be "/." and is quite easy to find it on the keyboard
>
> Since it looks pretty good with the spaces there.
>
> 2008/10/27 Johannes Schl=FCter <johannes@php.net>:
>> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 01:43 +1030, Andrew Mason wrote:
>>> Both Perl and C++ use :: to success. i don't know how much of an
>>> overlap there is in PHP and Perl or C++ programmers, so I'm not
>>> suggesting it for familiarity reasons, but i have never heard anyone
>>> say "i wish C++/ Perl used a different namespace separator.
>>
>> Yes, and as said multiple times: Using "::" is impossible and
>> alternatives were discussed multiple times, decision was made with
>> discussions over multiple years now.
>>
>> So please let's move on and in a year or two we won't hear "anyone say
>> "i wish PHP used a different namespace separator""
>>
>> Thanks for no further wasting of time. (neither yours nor mine, ...)
>> (except you find somethign which wasn't discussed within the last 5 yrs)
>>
>> johannes
>>
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
developer flamerobin.org