Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41454 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97658 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2008 14:10:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Oct 2008 14:10:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php-php-dev@m.gmane.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=news@ger.gmane.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-php-dev@m.gmane.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.91.229.2 main.gmane.org Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [80.91.229.2] ([80.91.229.2:34036] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/84-34199-0CBC5094 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:10:11 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KuSnB-0007sk-QG for internals@lists.php.net; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:01 +0000 Received: from p5b37615a.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.55.97.90]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:01 +0000 Received: from sb by p5b37615a.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:09:55 +0100 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <49048EC1.9060908@chiaraquartet.net> <6BBBBBAF-E67A-4207-8068-BB609B4A3BDE@pooteeweet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b37615a.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) In-Reply-To: <6BBBBBAF-E67A-4207-8068-BB609B4A3BDE@pooteeweet.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespace separator and whining From: sb@sebastian-bergmann.de (Sebastian Bergmann) Lukas Kahwe Smith schrieb: > Now the people that were not able to attend this IRC meeting can > either accept that there was a sufficient number of people to make > a final decision on something that everybody (obviously also people > who did not attend the meeting) had plenty of time to make their > concerns heard or you can question this approach. It eludes me how something can be discussed and be voted upon when the only basis for discussion is the current implementation (that has no specification). -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69