Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41433 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43518 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2008 10:34:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Oct 2008 10:34:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kenashkov@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kenashkov@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kenashkov@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.13 mail-gx0-f13.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.13] ([209.85.217.13:39243] helo=mail-gx0-f13.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/2A-34199-13995094 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:34:25 -0500 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so2148236gxk.23 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:34:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4It2YEE2cXwWWvVrsD/k5x5EOGd02ZrKsZkYm6LTG2g=; b=eTFpCr6MC6ZU8oRX/rSX3pxBySu/gIyVGdM6ugvh1ol1h120yrtXFlK6q2dTnAddsO JLdeMrdA3w7TzAzimVsaY7YaIANpGLkWqiYJ0ELejTTq6KSEhOAtcK/h4ZvyujzDFY0G 8O/SrVa/pu4i60GppvGD3duWkygcX4Mfh6Pvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=i0Y7jaDuXaQZv6cSevzb0gQAuimGZ7NZbaEut8eCAB9wQ2JdKTD+ZhtaRf5TafRxDX D3UxkqtcBi58mvb3ydVWZBm2bptNKl2NxJwIYbQocSVyUuyVykDkBukrnnX9KO38mTJt NTmG2xUYQgMJk/I+g17Egon22KUHUxzNkNpp0= Received: by 10.90.71.16 with SMTP id t16mr2148565aga.26.1225103662552; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.88.11 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <261daaa10810270334x380e41a8of889938d0bc77c13@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:34:22 +0200 To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" Cc: "PHP internals" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_29071_3145896.1225103662538" References: <49047D62.1030900@lsces.co.uk> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: From: kenashkov@gmail.com ("Vesselin Kenashkov") ------=_Part_29071_3145896.1225103662538 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I want to express my happiness of finally having an agreement/solution for the namespaces. I have something like 70 000 LOC with namespaces (and a lot of static calls/class consts) so it will take some time to convert it to \ but I'm still very happy to have a solution. Like Karsten Dambekalns said in one of the threads it is more important to have ns support than the precise way it will be implemented/separator used, no matter that we have code written already - we will modify it. As a personal opinion - the backslash is fine for me because: - it is only one character - readable enough (something\another\thing) - no BC (like the proposed#hash#sign) - it will be somewhat familiar for the windows users (I'm not, but still is a +) I really hope that after testing the patch there will be no issues and this solution will get into the final version (and will put the end of the ns discussion). Big thanks to the people involved! -- Vesselin Kenashkov developer at www.webstudiobulgaria.com ------=_Part_29071_3145896.1225103662538--