Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41422 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4551 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2008 07:24:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Oct 2008 07:24:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=wrowe@rowe-clan.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=wrowe@rowe-clan.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rowe-clan.net from 64.202.165.39 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: wrowe@rowe-clan.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.202.165.39 smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net Received: from [64.202.165.39] ([64.202.165.39:38364] helo=smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/43-34199-ACC65094 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:24:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 22485 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2008 07:24:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (65.35.144.63) by smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.39) with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2008 07:24:55 -0000 Message-ID: <49056CC6.1050108@rowe-clan.net> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:24:54 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Beaver CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <49048EC1.9060908@chiaraquartet.net> <49056A15.2060300@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <49056A15.2060300@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespace separator and whining From: wrowe@rowe-clan.net ("William A. Rowe, Jr.") William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Greg Beaver wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Let me make this brief: there will be lots of complaining about the >> namespace separator. >> >> Stop. Now. > > And if you had the common decency not to change the thread-id and subject > some on this list might respect the spirit of your plea. I should add that I'm guilty of marking-read entire-thread. having scrolled back, it's pretty clearly time for another Rasmus intervention into what -was- a technical discussion, a couple 100 posts ago.