Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41265
Return-Path: <helly@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 17098 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2008 20:41:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Oct 2008 20:41:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:40989] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 51/16-11719-CE94AF84 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:41:16 -0400
Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (41-88.106-92.cust.bluewin.ch [92.106.88.41])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF6511DB78;
	Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:41:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:38:23 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <11363246.20081018223823@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org>
CC: Steph Fox <steph@php.net>, internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <289E9A57-3FAF-473F-BCD3-91687187309B@pooteeweet.org>
References: <00c401c92f99$84826690$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> <289E9A57-3FAF-473F-BCD3-91687187309B@pooteeweet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 'Sanity' tally to date
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Lukas,

  --stas_s->option->because_I_could_not_read_that_code;


  marcus

Thursday, October 16, 2008, 6:51:29 PM, you wrote:


> On 16.10.2008, at 16:14, Steph Fox wrote:

>> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and  
>> relevant
>> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if  
>> there's to
>> be namespace support in 5.3.
>>
>> At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full  
>> disambiguation
>> (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace').
>>
>> Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a
>> point. (A weighted version is also offered here.)
>>
>> D/S means 'with different separator'.


> i guess i should note that Steph's tally only includes votes on Greg's  
> proposal. Stas proposal is obviously also still up for vote. In that  
> sense "doesnt work" is maybe a bit too harshly said in the appendix of  
> Greg's proposal, though it does obviously point out an issue. Overall  
> no proposal comes without some caveat (or this all would be easy).

> regards,
> Lukas Kahwe Smith
> mls@pooteeweet.org







Best regards,
 Marcus