Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41241
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 66.249.82.235 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=CxF3Ehdcvf6rf/3uDxBRkAWrO4/utZ9qQR3cgptB1H3Z1zWPd0R8aYmpF6+rp43eTB
         lNO2bWXjDmUrf1QXcHGBXubGez781Q2kXRHftvaZ5/0QGGZILIzQx/gGxla6JRf9uUDu
         QzjyUMQ7G1wY3VIuZBxrWOLnYEXocqerAEvAM=
Message-ID: <34eeaeca0810171157i69004c21g3ae94eadc91bd094@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:57:39 -0500
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <02ef01c9307a$ede8f360$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_31647_1017830.1224269859087"
References: <02fe01c92fc6$0b2d0660$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <7D.26.12818.A13F7F84@pb1.pair.com>
	 <027901c92ffe$b4d11610$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> <48F8C2C9.90303@zend.com>
	 <02ef01c9307a$ede8f360$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2
From: pencap@gmail.com ("Mike Willbanks")

------=_Part_31647_1017830.1224269859087
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

1. #3 - it is much cleaner to read than the other implementations in
resolving the conflict.  a different separator will be much harder to simply
see from a comparison.  in a state where many people are in fact doing code
reviews and as it gets larger into big business the easier to read is going
to be the best option (which is why #1 and #2 become difficult).  #4 could
have larger drawbacks in the terms of integration with existing projects or
could cause conflicts and frustration.
2. No opinion.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Steph Fox <steph@php.net> wrote:

> Hi Stas,
>
>  So far, my proposals hardly got any hearing at all, fair or otherwise -
>> they were totally ignored on the vote - never even mentioned except for the
>> note in Greg's wiki (which, despite being incorrect, was never fixed or
>> changed), and it looks like at least some of the persons were under
>> impression they vote for something I had proposed and in fact voted for
>> something completely different.
>>
>
> Don't worry, I'll work out some way to rectify that if needed (hopefully
> without flooding internals@ again). All we're really getting out of this
> straw poll is a broader picture of the elements that PHP users would or
> would not like to see.
>
> - Steph (4 votes to go)
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

------=_Part_31647_1017830.1224269859087--