Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41232 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35995 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2008 15:56:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Oct 2008 15:56:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=et@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=et@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 62.75.137.136 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: et@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.75.137.136 fuer-et.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [62.75.137.136] ([62.75.137.136:50649] helo=eve.fuer-et.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AF/E3-19022-E85B8F84 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:56:00 -0400 Received: from lapalma.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (lapalma.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.165.195]) by eve.fuer-et.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2116158564 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:55:56 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:55:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <48F653FF.5010106@chiaraquartet.net> <48F7D98E.1000003@zend.com> <48F7F238.8040703@chiaraquartet.net> In-Reply-To: <48F7F238.8040703@chiaraquartet.net> X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.mis.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/People/walk/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200810171755.55594.et@php.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] my last attempt at sanity with namespaces From: et@php.net (Stefan Walk) On Friday 17 October 2008 04:02:32 Gregory Beaver wrote: > Hi Stas, > > This is not what is proposed. The E_WARNING is *only* on a name > conflict. Please re-read or try the patch: > > http://pear.php.net/~greg/resolve_conflict.patch.txt > > Greg Any particular reason why it defaults to seeing it as a namespace member function and not as a static method call? I'd guess it "guesses wrong" more often this way. Regards, Stefan