Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41211 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52012 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2008 10:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Oct 2008 10:58:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ron@connectholland.nl; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ron@connectholland.nl; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain connectholland.nl from 81.4.92.194 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ron@connectholland.nl X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.4.92.194 seoul.virtualbuilding.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [81.4.92.194] ([81.4.92.194:49509] helo=seoul.virtualbuilding.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7E/36-12818-7CF68F84 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:58:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by seoul.virtualbuilding.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C46F5A1434; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:54:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at seoul.virtualbuilding.nl Received: from seoul.virtualbuilding.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jonKkh6uGh3O; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.123.123.7] (82-204-104-166.fttx.bbeyond.nl [82.204.104.166]) by seoul.virtualbuilding.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72F4D5A1430; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48F87052.8020108@connectholland.nl> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:00:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nathan@kraya.co.uk CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <48F86EB4.5080308@kraya.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <48F86EB4.5080308@kraya.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] UltraSimple Namespace Solution From: ron@connectholland.nl (Ron Rademaker) Nathan Rixham wrote: > > thus: > //this is always the function two in namespace one::step > one::step::two(); > //this is always the method two of class step in namespace one > one::Step::two(); > > thoughts, opinions, reasons why it wouldn't work? Though: this will break a awful lot of existing code Opinion: bad idea Ron > > regards, > > nathan >