Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41196 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83055 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2008 04:31:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Oct 2008 04:31:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mark@hell.ne.jp; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mark@hell.ne.jp; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hell.ne.jp designates 84.96.92.124 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mark@hell.ne.jp X-Host-Fingerprint: 84.96.92.124 sp604003av.neufgp.fr Received: from [84.96.92.124] ([84.96.92.124:47163] helo=neuf-infra-smtp-out-sp604003av.neufgp.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/19-12818-D1518F84 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:31:29 -0400 Received: from neuf-infra-smtp-out-sp604002av.neufgp.fr ([10.110.56.119]) by neuf-infra-smtp-out-sp604003av.neufgp.fr with neuf telecom id Tf6e1a0042aL7UA03gXPgK; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:23 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.25] ([77.207.3.30]) by neuf-infra-smtp-out-sp604002av.neufgp.fr with neuf telecom id TgXN1a0040erKVH02gXPyS; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:23 +0200 To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <6fef9b880810161948x4cb98c08r1f92543f75592533@mail.gmail.com> References: <6fef9b880810161948x4cb98c08r1f92543f75592533@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1224217882.1712.431.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Vote from a "Mere User" From: mark@hell.ne.jp (Mark) A "mere user" here too with some php namespace experience (with current implementation). Issue 1: Choice #4, with a fallback on choice #3 Issue 2: This should be a php.ini option, typically it's going to cause a lot of (useless) calls to __autoload() for some existing code while migrating to a namespace-oriented code. This is also going to break things for some people who use require() in __autoload(). Mark Le vendredi 17 octobre 2008 à 13:18 +1030, Josh a écrit : > I'm another "mere user", but here are my votes > > Issue 1: Choice #3 > > Issue 2: Agree with Greg. > > Josh Heidenreich > ZCE >