Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41133
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.200.168 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=h72Wr5uOIRlmwsWfhIPfB7h+1uKA6FlK720+ckQPhbQhUKmSzEN/JADNAx+mrk4R2J
         gN6kFVtgM3xCUv6gO5Xk0OM8bqVhhB1Dv0zyTU9khV7cidkdhQzZ2ZAO7PcHCflv6Er4
         dnZDF/wxNtwKJtYJvOITbRUuV6BMGmFXU2PaM=
Message-ID: <ff8c5b580810160824y2b6ea28fx848d20cf8d9a7fc6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:24:39 +0100
To: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <9C.12.49179.9BA57F84@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_45496_3891235.1224170679704"
References: <00c401c92f99$84826690$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
	 <9C.12.49179.9BA57F84@pb1.pair.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 'Sanity' tally to date
From: luke.richards.99@gmail.com ("Luke Richards")

------=_Part_45496_3891235.1224170679704
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

In my opinion namespaces should be in 6 not 5.3 but ignoring that:

+1 for Issue 1 option 1
+1 for Issue 2

2008/10/16 Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com>

> Steph Fox wrote:
>
>> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant
>> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's
>> to
>> be namespace support in 5.3.
>>
>> At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation
>> (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace').
>>
>> Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a
>> point. (A weighted version is also offered here.)
>>
>> D/S means 'with different separator'.
>>
>> Name                Issue A                    Issue B
>> ======================================================
>> Greg                #2 (alt #3, #1)            Yes
>> Guilherme           #3                         Yes
>> Kalle               #4                         Yes
>> Tony Bibbs          #3                         Yes
>> Jaroslav Hanslik    #1 (alt #3)                Yes
>> Nathan Rixham       #4 (D/S)                   N/A
>> Liz                 #1 or #3                   Yes
>> Andrei        - 'agreed with Gregs approach'   N/A
>> Janusz Lewandowski  #4                         Yes
>> Steph               #3 (alt #2)                Abstained
>> Josh Davies   - '#1 and #2 are functionally the same' N/A
>> Hannes        - put in a plea for classes only in 5.3 N/A
>> Lester        - WROTE SOMETHING LOUD           N/A
>> Alexey              #3                         Yes
>> Marc Boeren         #1 (D/S)                   N/A
>> Derick              #1                         No
>> Vesselin Kenashkov  #3                         Yes
>> Lars                #3 (alt #2)                N/A
>> Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3)                Yes
>> Jochem Maas         #2 (alt #3, #1)            Yes
>> Richard Quadling    #1 (alt #2)                No
>>
>> Issue A:
>> #1 - 8 (1 with different separator)
>> #2 - 5
>> #3 - 11
>> #4 - 3 (1 with different separator)
>>
>> Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1):
>> #1 - 12 + 2 = 14
>> #2 -  4 + 3 =  7
>> #3 - 12 + 5 = 17
>> #4 -  6 + 0 =  6
>>
>> Issue B:
>> Yes - 11
>> No  - 2 (see Richard's rationale tho')
>> Abs - 1
>> N/A - 7
>>
>>
> you can add me down for a +1 on the solution to Issue B as well
> - makes logical sense
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

------=_Part_45496_3891235.1224170679704--