Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41128
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <9C.12.49179.9BA57F84@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:15:07 +0100
Reply-To: nrixham@gmail.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <00c401c92f99$84826690$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
In-Reply-To: <00c401c92f99$84826690$3ffc1f3e@foxbox>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: 'Sanity' tally to date
From: nrixham@gmail.com (Nathan Rixham)

Steph Fox wrote:
> Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant
> opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to
> be namespace support in 5.3.
> 
> At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation
> (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace').
> 
> Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a
> point. (A weighted version is also offered here.)
> 
> D/S means 'with different separator'.
> 
> Name                Issue A                    Issue B
> ======================================================
> Greg                #2 (alt #3, #1)            Yes
> Guilherme           #3                         Yes
> Kalle               #4                         Yes
> Tony Bibbs          #3                         Yes
> Jaroslav Hanslik    #1 (alt #3)                Yes
> Nathan Rixham       #4 (D/S)                   N/A
> Liz                 #1 or #3                   Yes
> Andrei        - 'agreed with Gregs approach'   N/A
> Janusz Lewandowski  #4                         Yes
> Steph               #3 (alt #2)                Abstained
> Josh Davies   - '#1 and #2 are functionally the same' N/A
> Hannes        - put in a plea for classes only in 5.3 N/A
> Lester        - WROTE SOMETHING LOUD           N/A
> Alexey              #3                         Yes
> Marc Boeren         #1 (D/S)                   N/A
> Derick              #1                         No
> Vesselin Kenashkov  #3                         Yes
> Lars                #3 (alt #2)                N/A
> Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3)                Yes
> Jochem Maas         #2 (alt #3, #1)            Yes
> Richard Quadling    #1 (alt #2)                No
> 
> Issue A:
> #1 - 8 (1 with different separator)
> #2 - 5
> #3 - 11
> #4 - 3 (1 with different separator)
> 
> Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1):
> #1 - 12 + 2 = 14
> #2 -  4 + 3 =  7
> #3 - 12 + 5 = 17
> #4 -  6 + 0 =  6
> 
> Issue B:
> Yes - 11
> No  - 2 (see Richard's rationale tho')
> Abs - 1
> N/A - 7
> 

you can add me down for a +1 on the solution to Issue B as well
- makes logical sense