Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41107 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51916 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2008 03:21:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Oct 2008 03:21:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 208.83.222.18 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 208.83.222.18 unknown Linux 2.6 Received: from [208.83.222.18] ([208.83.222.18:53401] helo=mail.bluga.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0A/FA-33247-143B6F84 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:21:37 -0400 Received: from mail.bluga.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB54DC108B3 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:21:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.106] (unknown [76.84.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898BCC108B2 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:21:28 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <48F6B3C5.9030102@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:23:49 -0500 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals Mailing List X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: namespaces sanity: addition to RFC explaining why Stas's proposal doesn't work From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Gregory Beaver) Hi again, I was asked to explain why I hadn't included ClassName->Method(); in the list of ideas that solve the ambiguity problem. I added a brief section to the RFC that does so: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues#why_stas_s_proposed_solution_doesn_t_work Thanks, Greg