Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41082 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19839 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2008 16:24:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Oct 2008 16:24:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:25566] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7E/67-17660-12916F84 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:24:02 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:24:22 +0200 Received: from [192.168.27.6] ([192.168.27.6]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:24:13 -0700 Message-ID: <48F6192D.4080900@zend.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:24:13 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?= CC: Derick Rethans , Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Development References: <3CF765DF-27AF-44FD-9ECF-BEBFC8A0AFCA@pooteeweet.org> <3B114D01-DA15-4630-BF90-C84395CC99E7@bitextender.com> In-Reply-To: <3B114D01-DA15-4630-BF90-C84395CC99E7@bitextender.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2008 16:24:13.0901 (UTC) FILETIME=[764CEFD0:01C92EE2] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces and alpha3 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > My thoughts exactly. I realize it's a bold move, but it's a much better > alternative than the fuzz about an implementation that doesn't work, or > is incomplete, or needs to be broken in the future to add new stuff. Of course, if we have no implementation this means it is complete, not broken and never needs any stuff to be added. That's perfect, let's do all the features this way! -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com