Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:41015 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18455 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2008 19:21:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Oct 2008 19:21:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.163 il-gw1.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.163] ([212.25.124.163:50140] helo=il-gw1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 05/82-25867-051F4F84 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:21:54 -0400 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:22:11 +0200 Received: from [192.168.16.110] ([192.168.16.110]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:22:08 -0700 Message-ID: <48F4F160.1040407@zend.com> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:22:08 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steph Fox CC: PHP internals References: <696583.1217.qm@web707.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <037801c92e27$c913f3a0$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> <48F4E520.5050200@lsces.co.uk> <48F4E824.7020104@zend.com> <002901c92e2f$acdac990$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> In-Reply-To: <002901c92e2f$acdac990$3ffc1f3e@foxbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2008 19:22:08.0388 (UTC) FILETIME=[2660A440:01C92E32] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] namespaces and alpha3 From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > The problem is we can't know whether restricting *future* evolution in > namespace support is going to turn out to be a good idea. I think we have now all the information we could have without really having it in the wild. Yes, we can make a mistake based on this information, but I see no use in sitting there and doing nothing but asking ourselves "do we make a mistake?". We are not advancing with it that way. If you can name something that could further our progress here and that can be done after 5.3 but can't be done right now - name it. Otherwise I see absolutely no reason in postponing the decision. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com